Evaluation of two fecal occult blood tests for detecting non-perforating abomasal lesions in cattle

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Evaluation of two fecal occult blood tests for detecting non-perforating abomasal lesions in cattle. / Munch, Sara Lee; Nielsen, Søren Saxmose; Krogh, Mogens Agerbo; Capion, Nynne.

I: Animals, Bind 10, Nr. 12, 2356, 2020, s. 1-13.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Munch, SL, Nielsen, SS, Krogh, MA & Capion, N 2020, 'Evaluation of two fecal occult blood tests for detecting non-perforating abomasal lesions in cattle', Animals, bind 10, nr. 12, 2356, s. 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10122356

APA

Munch, S. L., Nielsen, S. S., Krogh, M. A., & Capion, N. (2020). Evaluation of two fecal occult blood tests for detecting non-perforating abomasal lesions in cattle. Animals, 10(12), 1-13. [2356]. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10122356

Vancouver

Munch SL, Nielsen SS, Krogh MA, Capion N. Evaluation of two fecal occult blood tests for detecting non-perforating abomasal lesions in cattle. Animals. 2020;10(12):1-13. 2356. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10122356

Author

Munch, Sara Lee ; Nielsen, Søren Saxmose ; Krogh, Mogens Agerbo ; Capion, Nynne. / Evaluation of two fecal occult blood tests for detecting non-perforating abomasal lesions in cattle. I: Animals. 2020 ; Bind 10, Nr. 12. s. 1-13.

Bibtex

@article{957d2b836fcd48c599803bf6d70eb6b1,
title = "Evaluation of two fecal occult blood tests for detecting non-perforating abomasal lesions in cattle",
abstract = "Non-perforating abomasal lesions occur with a high prevalence in slaughtered dairy cattle. Ante mortem diagnosis is a challenge, but the presence of occult blood in feces is suggested as a diagnostic criterion. The lower detection limit of Hemo-Fec{\textregistered} (Med-Kjemi, Asker, Norway) and Hemoccult II{\textregistered} SENSA{\textregistered} (Beckman Coulter, Brea, California, USA) for fecal occult blood were estimated. The Hemo-Fec{\textregistered} and Hemoccult II{\textregistered} SENSA{\textregistered} could detect 1-2 mL and 2-4.5 mL of blood in 1000 g of feces, respectively. Therefore, the Hemo-Fec{\textregistered} test was selected to access hemoglobin degradation in the rumen to establish if blood from outside the gastrointestinal tract could result in false-positive tests and an observational study to estimate the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity. Rumen microbiota did not degrade hemoglobin in a 1% blood concentration in vitro during 48 h of fermentation. The Hemo-Fec{\textregistered} test was only able to detect cattle with ≥4 acute lesions (diagnostic sensitivity: 0.40 [95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.32-0.48] and ≥4 chronic lesions (sensitivity: 0.44 [95% CI: 0.35-0.52]). The Hemo-Fec{\textregistered} test had no diagnostic potential to detect superficial erosions or scar tissue in abomasa. Furthermore, the specificity was 0.71 [95% CI: 0.68-0.75%], and a positive test is thus not equivalent with abomasal lesions in cattle.",
author = "Munch, {Sara Lee} and Nielsen, {S{\o}ren Saxmose} and Krogh, {Mogens Agerbo} and Nynne Capion",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.3390/ani10122356",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "1--13",
journal = "Animals",
issn = "2076-2615",
publisher = "MDPI",
number = "12",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of two fecal occult blood tests for detecting non-perforating abomasal lesions in cattle

AU - Munch, Sara Lee

AU - Nielsen, Søren Saxmose

AU - Krogh, Mogens Agerbo

AU - Capion, Nynne

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - Non-perforating abomasal lesions occur with a high prevalence in slaughtered dairy cattle. Ante mortem diagnosis is a challenge, but the presence of occult blood in feces is suggested as a diagnostic criterion. The lower detection limit of Hemo-Fec® (Med-Kjemi, Asker, Norway) and Hemoccult II® SENSA® (Beckman Coulter, Brea, California, USA) for fecal occult blood were estimated. The Hemo-Fec® and Hemoccult II® SENSA® could detect 1-2 mL and 2-4.5 mL of blood in 1000 g of feces, respectively. Therefore, the Hemo-Fec® test was selected to access hemoglobin degradation in the rumen to establish if blood from outside the gastrointestinal tract could result in false-positive tests and an observational study to estimate the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity. Rumen microbiota did not degrade hemoglobin in a 1% blood concentration in vitro during 48 h of fermentation. The Hemo-Fec® test was only able to detect cattle with ≥4 acute lesions (diagnostic sensitivity: 0.40 [95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.32-0.48] and ≥4 chronic lesions (sensitivity: 0.44 [95% CI: 0.35-0.52]). The Hemo-Fec® test had no diagnostic potential to detect superficial erosions or scar tissue in abomasa. Furthermore, the specificity was 0.71 [95% CI: 0.68-0.75%], and a positive test is thus not equivalent with abomasal lesions in cattle.

AB - Non-perforating abomasal lesions occur with a high prevalence in slaughtered dairy cattle. Ante mortem diagnosis is a challenge, but the presence of occult blood in feces is suggested as a diagnostic criterion. The lower detection limit of Hemo-Fec® (Med-Kjemi, Asker, Norway) and Hemoccult II® SENSA® (Beckman Coulter, Brea, California, USA) for fecal occult blood were estimated. The Hemo-Fec® and Hemoccult II® SENSA® could detect 1-2 mL and 2-4.5 mL of blood in 1000 g of feces, respectively. Therefore, the Hemo-Fec® test was selected to access hemoglobin degradation in the rumen to establish if blood from outside the gastrointestinal tract could result in false-positive tests and an observational study to estimate the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity. Rumen microbiota did not degrade hemoglobin in a 1% blood concentration in vitro during 48 h of fermentation. The Hemo-Fec® test was only able to detect cattle with ≥4 acute lesions (diagnostic sensitivity: 0.40 [95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.32-0.48] and ≥4 chronic lesions (sensitivity: 0.44 [95% CI: 0.35-0.52]). The Hemo-Fec® test had no diagnostic potential to detect superficial erosions or scar tissue in abomasa. Furthermore, the specificity was 0.71 [95% CI: 0.68-0.75%], and a positive test is thus not equivalent with abomasal lesions in cattle.

U2 - 10.3390/ani10122356

DO - 10.3390/ani10122356

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 33317186

VL - 10

SP - 1

EP - 13

JO - Animals

JF - Animals

SN - 2076-2615

IS - 12

M1 - 2356

ER -

ID: 253351920